> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.figr.design/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Review Design

> Get UX audits, accessibility checks, and expert critique. Identify issues before they ship. Grounded in patterns from 200,000+ screens.

## What Review Does

Review analyzes designs and provides actionable feedback. It catches usability issues, accessibility problems, and pattern violations that humans miss. Review provides:

* UX audits and critique
* Accessibility analysis (WCAG compliance)
* Pattern consistency checks
* Usability issue identification
* Improvement recommendations

<Frame>
  <img src="https://mintcdn.com/figr-1af7ae64/gGIZV8y15s2Ijner/images/uxreview.png?fit=max&auto=format&n=gGIZV8y15s2Ijner&q=85&s=6ca822abcc3835ce8f9025b46556f666" alt="Uxreview" width="3057" height="1872" data-path="images/uxreview.png" />
</Frame>

## When Figr Uses Review

Figr engages review when you:

* Ask for feedback on a design
* Request an audit or critique
* Want accessibility analysis
* Need to validate a approach
* Ask what's wrong or what to improve

<Accordion title="Trigger Phrases">
  ```text theme={null}
  "Review this design"
  "What's wrong with this?"
  "Check accessibility"
  "Give me feedback on..."
  "Audit this flow"
  "What could be better?"
  ```
</Accordion>

***

## [​](#review-types)Types of Review

<AccordionGroup>
  <Accordion title="UX Audit">
    Comprehensive usability analysis. UX audit covers:

    * Information hierarchy
    * Visual scanning patterns
    * Cognitive load assessment
    * Action clarity
    * Error prevention
    * User flow friction
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Accessibility Review">
    WCAG compliance and inclusive design. Accessibility checks:

    * Color contrast ratios
    * Touch target sizes
    * Screen reader compatibility
    * Keyboard navigation
    * Focus states
    * Alt text requirements
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Pattern Consistency">
    Does it match your product? Consistency checks:

    * Design system compliance
    * Component usage patterns
    * Spacing and alignment
    * Typography hierarchy
    * Interaction patterns
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Competitive Benchmark">
    How does it compare? Benchmark analysis:

    * Industry standard patterns
    * Best-in-class examples
    * Differentiating opportunities
    * Common conventions
  </Accordion>
</AccordionGroup>

***

## Getting Best Results

<AccordionGroup>
  <Accordion title="Provide Context">
    * **Better reviews with context:** "Review this onboarding flow. Target users are non-technical small business owners. Goal is completion in under 3 minutes."
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Ask Specific Questions">
    **Focused review:**

    * "Is the visual hierarchy clear?"
    * "Are the CTAs prominent enough?"
    * "Will users know what to do first?"
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Request Actionable Output">
    **Actionable asks:**

    * "What are the top 3 things to fix?"
    * "Give me specific recommendations I can implement"
    * "Prioritize issues by impact"
  </Accordion>
</AccordionGroup>