Skip to main content

​
Comparing Designs

Making design decisions is easier when you can clearly see alternatives side-by-side. Figr provides powerful comparison tools that help teams evaluate options and build consensus.

​
Comparison Methods

Visual comparison layouts:
Two design alternatives displayed side-by-side with comparison annotations
Layout options:
Split view: 50/50 vertical division
Multi-column: 3+ designs in columns
Carousel: Swipe between alternatives
Overlay: Designs stacked with transparency
Grid: Matrix view for many options

​
Comparison Frameworks

1

User-Centered Comparison

Evaluate based on user needs:
Measure effectiveness:
- Steps to complete primary task
- Cognitive load assessment
- Error prevention capabilities
- Recovery from mistakes
- Learning curve steepness
2

Business Impact Analysis

Connect design to business outcomes:
Business metrics:
Conversion potential: Which design drives more actions
Brand alignment: Consistency with brand values
Competitive position: Differentiation from competitors
Market appeal: Target audience resonance
Revenue impact: Projected business value
3

Technical Feasibility

Implementation reality check:

Development Effort

  • Implementation complexity
  • Required development time
  • Technical risk assessment
  • Resource requirements

Performance Impact

  • Page load implications
  • Rendering performance
  • Accessibility compliance
  • Cross-browser compatibility

​
Team Decision Making

Structured decision processes:
Interface showing stakeholder voting and feedback on design alternatives
Review workflow:
1. Present alternatives clearly
2. Explain evaluation criteria
3. Gather structured feedback
4. Discuss pros and cons
5. Document decision rationale

​
A/B Testing Integration

1

Test Design Setup

Prepare designs for user testing:
Test preparation:
- Ensure comparable functionality
- Match content and data
- Standardize testing conditions
- Define success metrics
- Plan statistical significance
2

Results Analysis

Interpret testing data:

Quantitative Results

  • Conversion rates
  • Task completion times
  • Error rates
  • Engagement metrics

Qualitative Insights

  • User feedback themes
  • Behavioral observations
  • Preference explanations
  • Usability issues
3

Design Iteration

Apply learnings to improve designs:
Post-test improvements:
- Combine winning elements
- Address identified issues
- Create hybrid solutions
- Plan follow-up tests

​
Comparison Documentation

Capture decision context:
Document for each comparison:
- Alternatives considered
- Evaluation criteria used
- Stakeholders involved
- Decision rationale
- Expected outcomes
- Success metrics defined

​
Advanced Comparison Features

AI-Assisted Analysis

Intelligent comparison insights:
  • Pattern recognition across designs
  • Best practice compliance checking
  • User research alignment analysis
  • Accessibility gap identification

Historical Comparison

Learn from past decisions:
  • Compare with previous successful designs
  • Track decision pattern evolution
  • Identify recurring design challenges
  • Reference proven solutions

​
Best Practices

1

Fair Comparison Setup

Ensure objective evaluation:
✅ Use equivalent content and data
✅ Test under similar conditions
✅ Consider all user scenarios
✅ Include edge cases and errors
✅ Account for different skill levels
2

Comprehensive Evaluation

Consider multiple perspectives:
✅ User experience and usability
✅ Business goal achievement
✅ Technical implementation reality
✅ Brand and design consistency
✅ Long-term maintainability
3

Decision Communication

Share decisions effectively:
✅ Clear rationale explanation
✅ Acknowledge trade-offs made
✅ Document next steps
✅ Plan success measurement
✅ Create implementation timeline

Explore Canvas Overview

Learn how to use zooming and overview features to navigate large design projects effectively.Zooming Overview →