Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.figr.design/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

​
What Review Does

Review analyzes designs and provides actionable feedback. It catches usability issues, accessibility problems, and pattern violations that humans miss. Review provides:
  • UX audits and critique
  • Accessibility analysis (WCAG compliance)
  • Pattern consistency checks
  • Usability issue identification
  • Improvement recommendations
Uxreview

​
When Figr Uses Review

Figr engages review when you:
  • Ask for feedback on a design
  • Request an audit or critique
  • Want accessibility analysis
  • Need to validate a approach
  • Ask what’s wrong or what to improve
"Review this design"
"What's wrong with this?"
"Check accessibility"
"Give me feedback on..."
"Audit this flow"
"What could be better?"

​
​Types of Review

Comprehensive usability analysis. UX audit covers:
  • Information hierarchy
  • Visual scanning patterns
  • Cognitive load assessment
  • Action clarity
  • Error prevention
  • User flow friction
WCAG compliance and inclusive design. Accessibility checks:
  • Color contrast ratios
  • Touch target sizes
  • Screen reader compatibility
  • Keyboard navigation
  • Focus states
  • Alt text requirements
Does it match your product? Consistency checks:
  • Design system compliance
  • Component usage patterns
  • Spacing and alignment
  • Typography hierarchy
  • Interaction patterns
How does it compare? Benchmark analysis:
  • Industry standard patterns
  • Best-in-class examples
  • Differentiating opportunities
  • Common conventions

​
Getting Best Results

  • Better reviews with context: “Review this onboarding flow. Target users are non-technical small business owners. Goal is completion in under 3 minutes.”
Focused review:
  • “Is the visual hierarchy clear?”
  • “Are the CTAs prominent enough?”
  • “Will users know what to do first?”
Actionable asks:
  • “What are the top 3 things to fix?”
  • “Give me specific recommendations I can implement”
  • “Prioritize issues by impact”